Agile XR
  • Welcome
  • Key Project Learnings and Reflections
  • Project Result 1
  • 1 - Guide: Agile Teamwork in Web-Based Learning
    • Chapter 1 - Agile in Software
      • 1.1 Values in Agile Software Development
      • 1.2 Principles in Agile Software Development
      • 1.3 Agile Project Management and practices
      • 1.4 Agile Mindset
    • Chapter 2 - Agile in Education
      • 2.1 Agile Compass for Education
      • 2.2 eduScrum
      • 2.3 Agora schools
      • 2.4 Agile Learning Centers
    • Chapter 3 - Agile practices for project-based learning
      • 3.1 Sprint Planning and Execution
      • 3.2 Daily Stand-Up Meetings
      • 3.3 Collaborative Learning and Projects
        • 3.3.1 Project initiation
        • 3.3.2 Project planning
        • 3.3.3 Project execution
        • 3.3.4 Project performance/monitoring
        • 3.3.5 Project closing
        • 3.3.6 Agile rituals using Mural
    • Conclusions
    • Bonus: Interviews with Agile Experts
      • Interview with Yeremi Marín, ALC Facilitator at EduCambiando, Mexico
      • Interview with Ryan Shollenberger, Co-director ALC NYC
      • Interview with Willy Wijnands, Cofounder eduScrum
  • 2 - Video Tutorials: Agile Teaching Techniques
  • Project Result 2
    • 3 - Guide: Implementing VR/XR in Team-Based Education
      • Our Approach: Design-Research
      • State of VR for Education
      • How To Choose VR Hardware and Software
      • Testing and Benchmarking VR Platforms
      • Designing Virtual Environments for VR Learning
    • 4 - Manual: Spatial.io for VR-Enhanced Teamwork
      • Terminology in XR
  • Project Result 3
    • 5 - Workshop: Designing Blended Learning Courses
      • Session 1 - Redesign Project Framing
      • Session 2 - Understanding the Student Experience
      • Session 3 - Understanding the Teacher Experience
      • Session 4 - Blended Course Plan
    • 6 - Workshop: Enhancing Existing Lessons for Blended Learning
      • Session 1 - Quick Scan
      • Session 2 - Deep Scan
    • 7 - Lesson Plan Templates for Online and Hybrid Learning
      • LP1 - Intro to AI - Elementary School
      • LP2 - Planning Skills - Lower Secondary Level
      • LP3 - Intro Radioactivity - Higher Secondary Level
      • LP4 - Berlin Wall - Upper Secondary Level
      • LP 5-10 - Lifelab Project - Upper Secondary Level
  • Project Result 4
    • 8 - Guide: Mastering Effective Distance Learning
      • Module 1: Introduction
        • What is distance learning and is it expanding so fast?
        • Online learning
      • Module 2: Methods of implementing distance learning
        • Synchronous online learning
        • Asynchronous online learning
        • Blended learning and flipped learning/classroom
      • Module 3: Classroom management in online learning
        • Class management in distance learning and how to engage students in distance learning
      • Module 4: Promoting collaborative learning in distance learning
        • Collaborative learning in distance learning
        • Problem-based learning and project-based learning in distance learning
        • Cooperative learning in distance learning
      • Module 5: How to promote social interactions in distance learning
      • Module 6: Educational technology tools for distance learning
      • References
    • 9 - Reference Guide: EdTech Tools for Interactive Teaching
      • Module 1: Introduction
        • How to get more student engagement?
        • How can we make it more collaborative?
        • What can be done with less or no teacher support? (e.g. for flipped classrooms)
      • Module 2: EdPuzzle
      • Module 3: Socrative
      • Module 4: Trello
      • Module 5: Nearpod
      • Module 6: Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, etc. (Shared document tools)
    • 10 - Digital Tool: EdTech Decision-Maker
    • 11 - Report: Evaluating Agile and VR/XR Teaching Pilots
      • Introduction
        • The project "Augmented Agile teamwork for hybrid learning at Schools” (AgileXR)
        • Project Result 4: Pilot and Impact Evaluation and Lessons Learned
        • Brief Theoretical Framework
        • Pilot Teaching Experiences in the AgileXR Project
      • Aim of the report
      • Method
        • Participants
        • Materials
        • Data Analysis
        • Procedure
      • Results and discussion
        • Students' perspectives
        • Teachers’ perspectives
      • Educational implications
      • Conclusions
      • Bibliographical references
      • Appendix
        • Appendix 1. Pilot evaluation student questionnaire
        • Appendix 2. Pilot evaluation teacher questionnaire
        • Appendix 3. GDPR - Family authorisation for secondary school students
  • Translations
    • 12 - Multilingual Publication Translations
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Project Result 4
  2. 11 - Report: Evaluating Agile and VR/XR Teaching Pilots
  3. Method

Participants

PreviousMethodNextMaterials

Last updated 1 year ago

303 students who participated in the pilots completed the questionnaire. Of these, after reading the informed consent form, 9 participants chose not to participate and therefore did not respond to the questionnaire This resulted in 303 participants. Descriptives and characteristics of the sample are shown in detail in Table 1. It should be noted that of the total number of students who participated in the pilots, approximately 80% completed the form after the pilot, as students were asked to participate voluntarily, and the form was anonymous. Consequently, a much larger number of students than the 303 who responded to the questionnaire was reached with the implementation of the pilots in the different countries.

Additionally, we have 21 responses to the teacher questionnaire, since not all teachers who implemented pilots answered the questionnaire, from those teachers who implemented the pilots with the help and collaboration of the members of the AgileXR project. 81% were men, 57% implemented type A pilots, 29% of the pilots used virtual reality, 24% were carried out with learning with great specific learning difficulties and disabilities, and 43% were carried out with students of low socioeconomic level. All teachers who responded implemented the pilots in secondary education.