Agile XR
  • Welcome
  • Key Project Learnings and Reflections
  • Project Result 1
  • 1 - Guide: Agile Teamwork in Web-Based Learning
    • Chapter 1 - Agile in Software
      • 1.1 Values in Agile Software Development
      • 1.2 Principles in Agile Software Development
      • 1.3 Agile Project Management and practices
      • 1.4 Agile Mindset
    • Chapter 2 - Agile in Education
      • 2.1 Agile Compass for Education
      • 2.2 eduScrum
      • 2.3 Agora schools
      • 2.4 Agile Learning Centers
    • Chapter 3 - Agile practices for project-based learning
      • 3.1 Sprint Planning and Execution
      • 3.2 Daily Stand-Up Meetings
      • 3.3 Collaborative Learning and Projects
        • 3.3.1 Project initiation
        • 3.3.2 Project planning
        • 3.3.3 Project execution
        • 3.3.4 Project performance/monitoring
        • 3.3.5 Project closing
        • 3.3.6 Agile rituals using Mural
    • Conclusions
    • Bonus: Interviews with Agile Experts
      • Interview with Yeremi Marín, ALC Facilitator at EduCambiando, Mexico
      • Interview with Ryan Shollenberger, Co-director ALC NYC
      • Interview with Willy Wijnands, Cofounder eduScrum
  • 2 - Video Tutorials: Agile Teaching Techniques
  • Project Result 2
    • 3 - Guide: Implementing VR/XR in Team-Based Education
      • Our Approach: Design-Research
      • State of VR for Education
      • How To Choose VR Hardware and Software
      • Testing and Benchmarking VR Platforms
      • Designing Virtual Environments for VR Learning
    • 4 - Manual: Spatial.io for VR-Enhanced Teamwork
      • Terminology in XR
  • Project Result 3
    • 5 - Workshop: Designing Blended Learning Courses
      • Session 1 - Redesign Project Framing
      • Session 2 - Understanding the Student Experience
      • Session 3 - Understanding the Teacher Experience
      • Session 4 - Blended Course Plan
    • 6 - Workshop: Enhancing Existing Lessons for Blended Learning
      • Session 1 - Quick Scan
      • Session 2 - Deep Scan
    • 7 - Lesson Plan Templates for Online and Hybrid Learning
      • LP1 - Intro to AI - Elementary School
      • LP2 - Planning Skills - Lower Secondary Level
      • LP3 - Intro Radioactivity - Higher Secondary Level
      • LP4 - Berlin Wall - Upper Secondary Level
      • LP 5-10 - Lifelab Project - Upper Secondary Level
  • Project Result 4
    • 8 - Guide: Mastering Effective Distance Learning
      • Module 1: Introduction
        • What is distance learning and is it expanding so fast?
        • Online learning
      • Module 2: Methods of implementing distance learning
        • Synchronous online learning
        • Asynchronous online learning
        • Blended learning and flipped learning/classroom
      • Module 3: Classroom management in online learning
        • Class management in distance learning and how to engage students in distance learning
      • Module 4: Promoting collaborative learning in distance learning
        • Collaborative learning in distance learning
        • Problem-based learning and project-based learning in distance learning
        • Cooperative learning in distance learning
      • Module 5: How to promote social interactions in distance learning
      • Module 6: Educational technology tools for distance learning
      • References
    • 9 - Reference Guide: EdTech Tools for Interactive Teaching
      • Module 1: Introduction
        • How to get more student engagement?
        • How can we make it more collaborative?
        • What can be done with less or no teacher support? (e.g. for flipped classrooms)
      • Module 2: EdPuzzle
      • Module 3: Socrative
      • Module 4: Trello
      • Module 5: Nearpod
      • Module 6: Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, etc. (Shared document tools)
    • 10 - Digital Tool: EdTech Decision-Maker
    • 11 - Report: Evaluating Agile and VR/XR Teaching Pilots
      • Introduction
        • The project "Augmented Agile teamwork for hybrid learning at Schools” (AgileXR)
        • Project Result 4: Pilot and Impact Evaluation and Lessons Learned
        • Brief Theoretical Framework
        • Pilot Teaching Experiences in the AgileXR Project
      • Aim of the report
      • Method
        • Participants
        • Materials
        • Data Analysis
        • Procedure
      • Results and discussion
        • Students' perspectives
        • Teachers’ perspectives
      • Educational implications
      • Conclusions
      • Bibliographical references
      • Appendix
        • Appendix 1. Pilot evaluation student questionnaire
        • Appendix 2. Pilot evaluation teacher questionnaire
        • Appendix 3. GDPR - Family authorisation for secondary school students
  • Translations
    • 12 - Multilingual Publication Translations
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Project Result 4
  2. 11 - Report: Evaluating Agile and VR/XR Teaching Pilots
  3. Method

Data Analysis

The data collected from the student and teacher questionnaire were subjected to a comprehensive analysis, aimed at elucidating the perceptions and experiences of students and teachers involved in the AgileXR project's pilot implementation. The analysis was twofold: descriptive and inferential, each serving a specific purpose in our understanding of the data.

Initially, descriptive statistical methods were employed to provide a foundational understanding of the data. This analysis focused on summarizing and organizing the data in a manner that facilitated a clear and concise presentation of the respondents' characteristics and responses. Key descriptive statistics, such as means, standard deviations, and percentages, were calculated. These statistics offered a preliminary insight into the central tendencies and variability within our dataset, particularly regarding students' engagement, motivation, sense of community, self-regulation, relationships with teachers, perception of learning, acquired skills, and their understanding of the agile mindset.

To further probe the data, Student t-tests were conducted. These tests are particularly useful for comparing the means of two groups and are instrumental in our study for exploring differences between various variables. For instance, the t-tests allowed us to examine whether there were statistically significant differences in students' perceptions and experiences based on different demographic variables (such as gender) or other relevant factors like the type of pilot or the teaching tools.

A significant component of our analysis involved comparing students' responses to the dual-aspect questions in the questionnaire. Each question required students to rate their agreement with a statement and to compare their experience in the pilot with their usual educational settings. This comparative approach enabled us to gauge the relative effectiveness and impact of the AgileXR project's methodologies and tools against traditional educational practices.

The data were analyzed using Jamovi 2.3.28, which provided robust tools for both descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. This software facilitated accurate and efficient processing of the data, ensuring the reliability of our findings.

PreviousMaterialsNextProcedure

Last updated 1 year ago