Agile XR
  • Welcome
  • Key Project Learnings and Reflections
  • Project Result 1
  • 1 - Guide: Agile Teamwork in Web-Based Learning
    • Chapter 1 - Agile in Software
      • 1.1 Values in Agile Software Development
      • 1.2 Principles in Agile Software Development
      • 1.3 Agile Project Management and practices
      • 1.4 Agile Mindset
    • Chapter 2 - Agile in Education
      • 2.1 Agile Compass for Education
      • 2.2 eduScrum
      • 2.3 Agora schools
      • 2.4 Agile Learning Centers
    • Chapter 3 - Agile practices for project-based learning
      • 3.1 Sprint Planning and Execution
      • 3.2 Daily Stand-Up Meetings
      • 3.3 Collaborative Learning and Projects
        • 3.3.1 Project initiation
        • 3.3.2 Project planning
        • 3.3.3 Project execution
        • 3.3.4 Project performance/monitoring
        • 3.3.5 Project closing
        • 3.3.6 Agile rituals using Mural
    • Conclusions
    • Bonus: Interviews with Agile Experts
      • Interview with Yeremi Marín, ALC Facilitator at EduCambiando, Mexico
      • Interview with Ryan Shollenberger, Co-director ALC NYC
      • Interview with Willy Wijnands, Cofounder eduScrum
  • 2 - Video Tutorials: Agile Teaching Techniques
  • Project Result 2
    • 3 - Guide: Implementing VR/XR in Team-Based Education
      • Our Approach: Design-Research
      • State of VR for Education
      • How To Choose VR Hardware and Software
      • Testing and Benchmarking VR Platforms
      • Designing Virtual Environments for VR Learning
    • 4 - Manual: Spatial.io for VR-Enhanced Teamwork
      • Terminology in XR
  • Project Result 3
    • 5 - Workshop: Designing Blended Learning Courses
      • Session 1 - Redesign Project Framing
      • Session 2 - Understanding the Student Experience
      • Session 3 - Understanding the Teacher Experience
      • Session 4 - Blended Course Plan
    • 6 - Workshop: Enhancing Existing Lessons for Blended Learning
      • Session 1 - Quick Scan
      • Session 2 - Deep Scan
    • 7 - Lesson Plan Templates for Online and Hybrid Learning
      • LP1 - Intro to AI - Elementary School
      • LP2 - Planning Skills - Lower Secondary Level
      • LP3 - Intro Radioactivity - Higher Secondary Level
      • LP4 - Berlin Wall - Upper Secondary Level
      • LP 5-10 - Lifelab Project - Upper Secondary Level
  • Project Result 4
    • 8 - Guide: Mastering Effective Distance Learning
      • Module 1: Introduction
        • What is distance learning and is it expanding so fast?
        • Online learning
      • Module 2: Methods of implementing distance learning
        • Synchronous online learning
        • Asynchronous online learning
        • Blended learning and flipped learning/classroom
      • Module 3: Classroom management in online learning
        • Class management in distance learning and how to engage students in distance learning
      • Module 4: Promoting collaborative learning in distance learning
        • Collaborative learning in distance learning
        • Problem-based learning and project-based learning in distance learning
        • Cooperative learning in distance learning
      • Module 5: How to promote social interactions in distance learning
      • Module 6: Educational technology tools for distance learning
      • References
    • 9 - Reference Guide: EdTech Tools for Interactive Teaching
      • Module 1: Introduction
        • How to get more student engagement?
        • How can we make it more collaborative?
        • What can be done with less or no teacher support? (e.g. for flipped classrooms)
      • Module 2: EdPuzzle
      • Module 3: Socrative
      • Module 4: Trello
      • Module 5: Nearpod
      • Module 6: Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, etc. (Shared document tools)
    • 10 - Digital Tool: EdTech Decision-Maker
    • 11 - Report: Evaluating Agile and VR/XR Teaching Pilots
      • Introduction
        • The project "Augmented Agile teamwork for hybrid learning at Schools” (AgileXR)
        • Project Result 4: Pilot and Impact Evaluation and Lessons Learned
        • Brief Theoretical Framework
        • Pilot Teaching Experiences in the AgileXR Project
      • Aim of the report
      • Method
        • Participants
        • Materials
        • Data Analysis
        • Procedure
      • Results and discussion
        • Students' perspectives
        • Teachers’ perspectives
      • Educational implications
      • Conclusions
      • Bibliographical references
      • Appendix
        • Appendix 1. Pilot evaluation student questionnaire
        • Appendix 2. Pilot evaluation teacher questionnaire
        • Appendix 3. GDPR - Family authorisation for secondary school students
  • Translations
    • 12 - Multilingual Publication Translations
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Project Result 4
  2. 11 - Report: Evaluating Agile and VR/XR Teaching Pilots
  3. Method

Materials

The student and teacher questionnaires (Appendix 1 & 2), forming a crucial component of our research methodology, was meticulously developed to gauge the perceptions of students and teachers regarding the AgileXR project's pilots in classroom practice. This instrument was primarily adapted from the frameworks established by Chatterjee & Correia (2020) and Kreijns et al. (2007), ensuring a robust foundation for our inquiry. To align with the unique objectives of our study, additional items were integrated, capturing a broader spectrum of variables pertinent to our research interests, including agile methodologies and technological tools for student collaboration.

The questionnaire is structured into multiple sections, each targeting a distinct aspect of the student experience and perception. The initial segment collects demographic information and context about the pilot experience, including birth year, gender, and the responsible entity for the pilot in their country. Subsequent sections delve into various thematic areas: Engagement and Motivation for Learning, Sense of Social Connection and Community, Self-Regulation, Relationships with the Teacher, Perception of Learning and Acquired Skills, and the Agile Mindset. Each question within these sections is twofold, assessing both the degree of agreement or disagreement with a statement and a comparative analysis with usual teacher-led activities.

In addition, the teacher questionnaire included three additional questions about the pilot's contribution to improving their own teaching skills in the use of technology, their teaching skills in general, and their contribution to students with difficulties (e.g. due to learning difficulties or low socio-economic status).

The questionnaire comprises both quantitative and qualitative elements. The quantitative questions employ a Likert scale, ranging from 'Strongly disagree' to 'Strongly agree' and comparative scales like 'Less than usual' to 'More than usual.' This approach allows for nuanced insight into the students' experiences compared to their regular educational settings. The qualitative aspects are encapsulated in open-ended questions, inviting expansive, subjective responses, thereby enriching our understanding with personal perspectives and detailed feedback.

Prior to participating, respondents are presented with an informed consent form, aligning with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and standards of good research practice. This form details the study's nature, purpose, confidentiality assurances, and the voluntary basis of participation. The confidentiality and protection of participants' information are paramount, adhering to GDPR and Spanish Organic Law 3/2018, ensuring the ethical integrity of the study.

PreviousParticipantsNextData Analysis

Last updated 1 year ago